Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40401243›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's dermatology2025

Preconceived ideas in hair care.

Jihane Belcadi, Sara Oulad Ali, Zhor Zeghari, Karima Senouci, Mariame Meziane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jihane BelcadiDepartment of Dermatology, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Sara Oulad AliDepartment of Dermatology, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Zhor ZeghariDepartment of Public Health, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, The Biostatistics, Clinical Research and Epidemiology Laboratory, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Karima SenouciDepartment of Dermatology, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Mariame MezianeDepartment of Dermatology, Mohamed V University of Rabat, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hair care beliefs and practices are influenced by cultural traditions and modern trends. Understanding these perceptions can help address common misconceptions and guide better care practices. Objective: This cross-sectional study aimed to explore widespread beliefs and routines related to hair care among a diverse population. Methods: A 40-item questionnaire was administered to 300 participants of various demographic backgrounds and hair types. It covered topics such as hair washing frequency, perceived factors affecting hair growth, use of hair care products, and the role of social media in influencing choices. Results: Findings revealed common misconceptions, including beliefs about the harmful effects of frequent washing, the importance of certain nutrients, and exaggerated expectations from specific products. Social media played a significant role in shaping participants' hair care behaviors. Limitations: The study relied on self-reported data, which may be biased. The sample may not represent the general population, and cultural nuances might be underrepresented. The cross-sectional design limits causal interpretation, and no clinical assessments were conducted. Conclusion: Dermatologists have a key role in dispelling myths and providing evidence-based advice. Educational efforts, both in clinical settings and via social media, could improve public understanding and promote healthier hair care practices.

Indexed as

dermatological advicedermatologyhair caremythssocial media influenceurban legends

Identifiers

PMID40401243
PMCPMC12094410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.