Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40401096›Full record

ArticleACS catalysis2025

Multiscale Simulation Guided Electric Field-Enhanced Ammonia Catalytic Cracking.

Pragyansh Singh, Qiang Li, Yilang Liu, Fanglin Che

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS catalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pragyansh SinghDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, United States.
Qiang LiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, United States.
Yilang LiuDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, United States.
Fanglin CheDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5109-8296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ammonia catalytic cracking offers an efficient solution for hydrogen production, storage, and distribution, making it ideal for onboard hydrogen generation in maritime propulsion systems when integrated with fuel cells. However, conventional heating methods, even with highly active ruthenium (Ru) catalysts, require high temperatures to achieve satisfactory performance, posing a challenge for industrial implementation. A promising strategy to address this limitation is the application of strong external electric fields, which can lower the temperature requirement through interactions between fields and the dipoles of polarized species during ammonia cracking. To explore such a field-dipole effect, we developed a multiscale simulation framework that integrates density functional theory (DFT) calculations with microkinetic modeling. This framework provides mechanistic insights, identifies key rate-limiting steps, and optimizes conditions for field-enhanced ammonia catalytic cracking over Ru. Our results show that at 673 K, applying a -1 V/Å negative electric field dramatically increases the turnover frequency from 0.03 s

Identifiers

PMID40401096
PMCPMC12090187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.