ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Marked Decline in Revision Rate Over Time After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MCID normalization: A methodological framework for harmonizing heterogeneous PROMs in hip arthroscopy research.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a body of scientific evidence showing good short-term outcomes after arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS); however, less is known about the change in short-term outcomes over time. Purpose: To (1) evaluate short-term outcomes after arthroscopic treatment for FAIS between 2 groups with index surgery at different periods and (2) assess whether there has been a change in clinical markers over time. Study Design: Cohort study; level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were retrospectively reviewed from a local hip arthroscopy registry, with primary hip arthroscopic treatment for FAIS and age ≥18 years as the inclusion criteria. The exclusion criteria consisted of surgical intervention to either hip before the primary arthroscopic intervention of the studied hip. Patients who underwent treatment between 2012 and 2013 were compared with patients who underwent treatment between 2017 and 2018. The revision rate within 2 years postoperatively was used as the primary outcome. Changes in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-including the International Hip Outcome Tool, the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Questionnaire, European Quality of Life Visual Analog Scale, the Hip Sports Activity Scale, visual analog scale for overall hip function, and a single question regarding satisfaction with treatment-were used as secondary outcomes. Results: Comparison of revision rates revealed a statistically significant decline from 9.1% for patients treated between 2012 and 2013 (n = 571 patients) to 1.2% for patients treated between 2017 and 2018 (n = 485 patients) ( Conclusion: There was a significant decline in revision rates over time. No changes were observed in PROMs over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.