Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40401084›Full record

ReviewPain reports2025

Effects of buprenorphine on pain perception in healthy adults: a meta-narrative systematic review.

W Michael Hooten, Danielle Zheng, Nicholas C Canzanello, Rajat N Moman, Larry Prokop, Nathan D Eberhart, Barlas Benkli, Salman Hirani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

W Michael HootenDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-6355
Danielle ZhengDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Nicholas C CanzanelloDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Rajat N MomanPain and Spine Centers of Florida, Lady Lake, FL, USA.
Larry ProkopMayo Clinic Libraries, Rochester, MN, USA.
Nathan D EberhartAnesthesiology Systematic Review Group, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Barlas BenkliDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Salman HiraniDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of knowledge about the effects of buprenorphine on pain perception in healthy adults could help investigators select experimental tests with evidence of responsiveness to buprenorphine in nondiseased states. The purpose of this meta-narrative systematic review is to summarize the effects of buprenorphine on pain perception in healthy adults. Comprehensive database searches were conducted from inception dates through July 16, 2024. Inclusion criteria included all study designs involving healthy adults receiving buprenorphine and tests of pain perception. Risk of bias was assessed using a tool developed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A meta-narrative approach was used due to high levels of clinical heterogeneity. A total of 10 RCTs were included, and healthy adults comprised the comparator groups in all trials. Three RCTs had a low risk of bias, 6 had some concerns, and 1 had a high risk of bias. Six RCTs used intravenous buprenorphine, 3 used transdermal, and 1 study used intravenous and sublingual buprenorphine. The effects of buprenorphine on pain perception are influenced by the route of administration, dose, and pain stimulus modality. Considerable differences exist in the effects of intravenous and transdermal buprenorphine, but only 1 study used sublingual buprenorphine, which limited comparison with the other drug formulations. Based on these findings, recommendations for clinical trials are proposed. These recommendations should be cautiously interpreted due to the clinical heterogeneity, but they provide a framework for advancing the use of experimental pain tests in trials of buprenorphine involving comparator groups of healthy adults.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineCold pain perceptionConditioned pain modulationHealthy subjectsHeat pain perceptionIntravenousMeta-narrativeNociceptive flexion reflexSublingualSystematic reviewTransdermal

Identifiers

PMID40401084
PMCPMC12094366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.