ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Visualization analysis of poisoning-related research based on CiteSpace.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of treatments for propranolol toxicity: a systematic review of current approaches and evidence.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative bibliometric insights into Chinese and international research onFrontiers in plant science · 2026Pooled it
- Progress in epigenetic research of breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis since the 2000s.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Phytochemical Diversity, Mechanistic Pharmacology, and Therapeutic Potential ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integration of Colorimetric Sensing Dyes and Multi-Substrate Arrays for Food Quality and Safety Monitoring: Design, Optimization, and Analysis.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Summarize the current status, hotspots, and frontier trends in poisoning research over the past decade using CiteSpace software, and provide direction for future research in toxicology and public health. Methods: Relevant literature published between 2015 and 2024 was retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Web of Science Core Collection. CiteSpace software was employed to conduct a visual analysis of poisoning-related research literature from the past decade. Results: A total of 5,644 Chinese articles and 14,985 English articles were included. High-frequency keywords in Chinese literature included "hemoperfusion" and "nursing" while high-frequency keywords in English literature included "exposure" "oxidative stress" and "identification." Keywords with strong betweenness centrality included "treatment," "blood purification" and "carbon monoxide." Recent emerging hotspots in Chinese literature were "liver function" and "oxidative stress" while in English literature, "gut microbiota" has recently gained attention. Conclusion: Poisoning-related research has shown an overall upward trend. The research hotspots in this field primarily include epidemiology, oxidative stress, clinical treatment, prognosis, and chemical substances (e.g., CO, paraquat). In-depth studies on gut microbiota and oxidative stress are expected to become future research trends in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.