Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40401051›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Building trust in rural communities: recruitment and retention strategies in developmental science.

Ava Reck, Lauren Holley, Kyle Bower, Sarah Whitaker, Caroline Hall, Courtney Brown, Alison Berg, Caroline Alvarado, Diane Bales, Katharine Suma and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ava ReckDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Lauren HolleyDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Kyle BowerDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Sarah WhitakerDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Caroline HallDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Courtney BrownExtension and Outreach, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Alison BergDepartment of Nutritional Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Caroline AlvaradoDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Diane BalesDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Katharine SumaDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Kimberly FowlerOffice of Research, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Charles GeierDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Assaf OshriDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Early Adversity and Drug Use Vulnerability Among Low Income Rural Children: Testing a Neuro-ecological Model of ResilienceR01DA055630 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI Assaf Oshri · 2023 to 2026
$2.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA055630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Studying human development often requires intimate interpersonal queries and interactions with children and families. Such research necessitates moving beyond traditional lab settings to engage participants within their communities for an extended period of time. Building trust is essential for conducting ecologically valid, longitudinal research, particularly when working with diverse and historically underserved populations. Developing effective, practical strategies to foster trust and rapport enhances recruitment, retention, and the overall quality of developmental research. This manuscript examines the recruitment and retention strategies aimed to facilitate trust and engagement in a longitudinal study involving rural participants in Northeast Georgia. Methodology: The continuum of community engagement model suggests that research recruitment efforts should involve more than direct participant outreach, toward a multifaceted, community-driven approach. The current study employs a mixed-methods framework to evaluate these strategies in fostering trust and participant engagement. Qualitative data was collected from study reflection notes, interviews with extension agents, and participant surveys, alongside quantitative measures tracking enrollment, contacts, referrals, and participant trust. Results: Our findings suggest that trust-building efforts, including community engagement teams, reciprocal community relationships, family and family-centered environments, and tailored communication strategies, enhanced participant engagement. Referrals emerged as the most effective method for recruitment. Integrating community-driven recruitment methods led to increased referrals and fostered long-term relationships and trust with community partners, but this success was only achieved after establishing connections and building trust within the community. Conclusion: Addressing historical mistrust and promoting research inclusivity requires iterative, community-centered approaches. Our study highlights the importance of transparent communication, adaptive recruitment strategies, and sustained community engagement. Findings provide a framework for future research aiming to enhance trust, recruitment, and retention in complex biomedical and behavioral developmental science, ensuring more representative and impactful studies.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionRural PopulationTrustAdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleGeorgiaHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalebuilding trustcommunity engagementdevelopmental sciencerecruitment and retentionrecruitment strategiesretention strategiesrural communitiesrural engagement

Identifiers

PMID40401051
PMCPMC12092468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.