Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400991›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

Early versus late chest tube removal after surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Quirine C A van Steenwijk, Louisa N Spaans, Jerry Braun, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Frank J C van den Broek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Quirine C A van SteenwijkDepartment of Surgery, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6749-4779
Louisa N SpaansDepartment of Surgery, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8667-3780
Jerry BraunDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4504-6235
Marcel G W DijkgraafDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0750-8790
Frank J C van den BroekDepartment of Surgery, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4828-5725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The optimal timing of postoperative chest tube removal remains disputable. Traditionally, chest tubes are left in place for several days for adequate pleurodesis and recurrence prevention after surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). Currently, early tube removal, defined as immediate removal upon cessation of air leakage, is increasingly practiced. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of early chest tube removal in terms of recurrence in these patients. Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched until January 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients undergoing pleurodesis through video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for PSP if chest tube management was clearly described to discriminate between early and late tube removal protocols, and recurrence rate with a postoperative follow-up period of at least six months was reported. The primary outcome was recurrence rate, with secondary outcomes including postoperative length of stay (LOS), prolonged air leakage (PAL) and chest tube duration. Subgroup analysis contained type of pleurodesis. The quality of evidence was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. Results: Thirty-six studies comprising 6,166 patients were included, lacking direct comparative studies on early versus late chest tube removal. Due to loss to follow-up, 6,063 patients were analysed regarding recurrence rate, resulting in 4.49% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.33-6.03%; I Conclusions: Although no direct comparative studies were retrieved, the best available evidence suggests that early chest tube removal may be associated with a slightly higher recurrence rate after surgical pleurodesis for pneumothorax. High-quality evidence is needed before implementing early removal.

Indexed as

chest tube durationPrimary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP)recurrence rate

Identifiers

PMID40400991
PMCPMC12093158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.