ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Pleural invasion of peripheral cT1 lung cancer by deep learning analysis of thoracoscopic images: a retrospective pilot study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sublobar resection for small peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (≤2 cm) became one of the standard procedures. Retrospective studies demonstrated that pathological pleural invasion (pPL) is associated with a higher risk of local recurrence during sublobar resection. If pPL can be properly assessed intraoperatively, converting to lobectomy may reduce the risk of local recurrence associated with sublobar resection. The study objective was to develop a deep learning algorithm predicting pPL from thoracoscopic images. Methods: Among consecutive patients who underwent radical thoracoscopic surgery for cT1N0M0 NSCLC (TNM 8th) from 5/2020 to 3/2022, 80 patients with pleural surface changes due to tumor (excluding cTis/1mi or peritumoral adhesions) were included. A tumor recognition deep learning model using the ResNet50 architecture was constructed from images and the focus was visualized using gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM). Among images in which a tumor is visible, the presence of pPL was predicted (trained on 64, validated on 16). Predictive ability was compared with the surgeons' intraoperative evaluation using McNemar's test. Results: Among 80 patients (age 69±10 years, 42.5% female, tumor diameter 20±7 mm), pPL was found in 22 patients. Compared to the pPL- group, the pPL+ group was significantly older, with larger solid diameter, more pure solid nodules, and higher SUV max. Among the 422,873 images extracted from all 80 videos, 2,074 images showed tumors, of which 608 images were pPL+. The tumor recognition algorithm had an image-level accuracy of 0.78 and F1 score of 0.60. The pPL model had a patient-level accuracy of 0.69, while the accuracy of thoracic surgeons was 0.75 (P=0.32). Conclusions: Deep learning analysis of thoracoscopic images of lung cancer surgery showed the possibility of prediction of pPL to a comparable degree to surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.