ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Biocompatibility of a novel lung sealant based on functionalized polyoxazolines in an ovine model of parenchymal lung injury.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of a Novel POx-Based Adhesive Powder for Obliterating Dead Spaces After Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A lung sealant based on a porcine gelatin carrier impregnated with N-hydroxysuccinimide ester functionalized poly(2)oxazolines (NHS-POx) and nucleophilically activated polyoxazolines (NU-POx) was shown to be efficacious for lung sealing Methods: Three groups, NHS-POx, fibrin patch (TachoSil Results: The total cell response score was significantly higher for NHS-POx Conclusions: The NHS-POx patch shows a comparable to favorable biocompatibility profile compared to fibrin patch, and is a potent candidate for clinical lung sealing applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.