ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Comparison of clinicopathologic features and prognosis between surgically resected pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small-cell lung cancer.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of RB1 immunohistochemistry for prognostic subtyping of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological Spectrum and Survival in Esophageal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A 74-Patient Cohort.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a serum inflammatory biomarker-driven machine-learning model for prognostic stratification in surgical limited-stage small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are classified as types of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (HGNEC). The aim of this study was to determine the similarities and differences in clinical features and prognosis between LCNEC and SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively compared the clinical features and prognosis of LCNEC and SCLC, along with well as their two subtypes, including pure LCNEC (P-LCNEC) and combined LCNEC (C-LCNEC) and SCLC combined with LCNEC and SCLC combined with non-LCNEC, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We included 341 patients with LCNEC and 580 patients with SCLC who underwent surgical treatment. Significant differences in smoking history, primary site, tumor location, pathological (p) N stage, pTNM stage, and visceral pleural invasion (VPI) were observed between LCNEC and SCLC groups (all P values <0.05). The subgroups of LCNEC (P-LCNEC and C-LCNEC) and SCLC (SCLC/LCNEC and SCLC/non-LCNEC) displayed differences in smoking history, primary site, tumor location, pT stage, pN stage, pTNM stage, VPI, adjuvant chemotherapy, and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. LCNEC and its subtypes P-LCNEC and C-LCNEC were associated with superior DFS and OS than were SCLC and its subtypes SCLC/LCNEC and SCLC/non-LCNEC (DFS: P=0.008, P=0.001, P=0.049; OS: P=0.005, P=0.005, P=0.006). Compared to patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, those with stage I SCLC or LCNEC who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a significantly improved DFS (P=0.005 and P=0.048) and OS (P=0.004 and P=0.03). Conclusions: LCNEC and SCLC, as well as their subtypes, have distinct clinical features and survival outcomes. SCLC exhibited more malignant biological behavior and was associated with a worse prognosis compared to LCNEC. Postoperative chemotherapy is recommended for patients with stage I HGNEC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.