Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400921›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2025

Phenotypes and endotypes in bronchiectasis: a narrative review of progress toward precision medicine.

Hayoung Choi, Yong-Hua Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hayoung ChoiDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4812-0653
Yong-Hua GaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8140-1679

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Bronchiectasis, which was previously regarded as a rare condition, has recently attracted increased attention with advancements in research and therapeutic strategies. However, heterogeneity remains a major challenge in the management of bronchiectasis. This review aims to elucidate the concepts of phenotypes and endotypes, facilitate a deeper understanding of bronchiectasis complexity, and pave the way for personalized treatment approaches. Methods: The PubMed database was searched for relevant articles published in English between January 1990 and August 2024 using keywords "bronchiectasis", "phenotype", "endotype", "diagnosis", "disease management", "complexity", "eosino*", "neutrop*", and "precision medicine". Key Content and Findings: We examined established clinical phenotypes, such as frequent exacerbator and chronic airway disease overlap, which significantly influence prognosis and therapeutic management. The significance of etiology-based phenotyping was also discussed while emphasizing how identifying specific underlying causes can guide targeted therapies. We further explored recent advancements in characterising bronchiectasis endotypes, particularly those marked by neutrophilic and eosinophilic inflammation. These endotypes provide valuable insights into underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and guide the selection of clinical management strategies. Recent cluster analysis research has identified distinct inflammatory endotypes in bronchiectasis, thereby improving the understanding of disease progression and identifying potential therapeutic targets. Integrating molecular endotyping with clinical phenotyping provides a more comprehensive perspective of the disease, underscoring the necessity of a dual approach to effectively address its inherent heterogeneity. Furthermore, we emphasize the significance of identifying treatable traits within these frameworks, which can enhance the precision of treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes. By exploring the interplay between clinical phenotypes, endotypes, and patient-specific characteristics, this review highlights the potential for advancing precision medicine for bronchiectasis. Conclusions: Enhancing our understanding of bronchiectasis through these concepts is essential for developing tailored interventions that target the underlying biological mechanisms, thereby improving disease management and patients' quality of life.

Indexed as

Bronchiectasisdisease managementendotypephenotypeprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID40400921
PMCPMC12090171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.