ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Influence of clinical severity and ventilation time on the use of timed inspiratory effort (TIE) as a predictor of success in ventilatory weaning.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV) is a critical phase in the recovery of patients undergoing prolonged ventilation. Previous studies have suggested the timed inspiratory effort (TIE) index as a potential predictor of weaning success. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of TIE and the impact of clinical severity and ventilation time on weaning outcomes. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in patients undergoing prolonged MV. Analysis included TIE measurements, duration of MV, and clinical severity as assessed by the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS3). Logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to determine the predictive value of TIE for weaning success. All statistical tests were performed with a significance level of P<0.05. Results: TIE showed limited utility as an independent predictor of weaning success, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.529 and a non-significant P value (P=0.79). In contrast, clinical severity as measured by the SAPS3 score was a significant predictor of weaning success (P=0.01). Patients with lower SAPS3 scores were more likely to be weaned successfully. Conclusions: TIE as an isolated tool is limited in predicting successful weaning from MV. Clinical severity, as assessed by tools such as the SAPS3 score, appears to be more relevant. Integrating multiple clinical parameters into decision models may improve weaning outcomes in ventilated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.