Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400891›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Does Malpractice Risk Deter Medical Students From Pursuing Obstetrics and Gynecology?

An Thai, Kimberly Huynh, Trevor Pickering, Angela Maron, Lana Wang, Hindi Stohl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

An ThaiObstetrics and Gynecology, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Kimberly HuynhObstetrics and Gynecology, Harbor University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, USA.
Trevor PickeringPublic Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Angela MaronObstetrics and Gynecology, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Lana WangObstetrics and Gynecology, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Hindi StohlObstetrics and Gynecology, Harbor UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background This research addresses the intricate process through which medical students choose or reject a specialty by investigating the factors that influence their decisions. One such factor is malpractice risk, which is a substantial consideration in specialties with higher risk for malpractice litigation, such as obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn). Our research probes the relationship between medical students' perception of risk for malpractice litigation and specialty preference by exploring the factors that deter medical students from choosing the field of Ob/Gyn and elucidating the factors that impact specialty choice. Methods Conducted as an online survey via email, our research engaged medical students across all four graduating class years (Class of 2022 to 2025) at Western University of Health Sciences Pomona and Western University of Health Sciences of Northwest osteopathic medical schools. There is a ratio of 75 males to every 100 females per graduating class (Class of 2022 to 2025). Rigorous beta testing and multiple revisions preceded the survey. Reminder emails were sent at 1- and 3-week intervals after distribution. We employed Pearson's Chi-square tests and Fisher's exact test to identify factors influencing specialty choice and assess perceived medico-legal risk. Results We obtained responses from 392 medical students across all four classes. The total respondents were 150 males and 242 females. Our analysis revealed that risk for malpractice litigation ranked as the third most prevalent factor dissuading medical students from pursuing Ob/Gyn; however, gender-specific disparities among other factors also played a role. Males cited disinterest, female predominance, and patient population as reasons against choosing Ob/Gyn, while females emphasized lifestyle and competitiveness. The study underscored factors pivotal for those choosing Ob/Gyn, including patient-related aspects and procedural abilities. Conclusions Medical liability did not significantly influence osteopathic medical students already planning to pursue Ob/Gyn, whereas gender emerged as a key factor among those deterred. Male students demonstrated greater awareness of medico-legal practice laws, though both genders reported only limited knowledge. Among those not choosing Ob/Gyn, females cited competitiveness, liability concerns, and lifestyle as significant deterrents. These gender-specific differences highlight disparities in medical education and underscore the need for targeted mentorship and educational initiatives to foster diversity within the specialty. Understanding these factors can help medical schools support students' specialty decisions and develop strategies to cultivate a more balanced workforce.

Indexed as

choosing specialityfear of malpracticemedical residencymedical school studentsmedico-legal implicationsobstetrics and gynecology residencyobstetrics & gynecologyosteopathic medical school

Identifiers

PMID40400891
PMCPMC12094277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.