Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400881›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

An Innovative Approach to Target Lesion Progression in the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1: The Enaworu 25 mm Nadir Rule.

Oghenetanure R Enaworu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Oghenetanure R EnaworuChao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 remains the benchmark for evaluating tumour response within clinical trials and oncological practice. It defines disease progression in target lesions as a ≥20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters (SLD), accompanied by an additional absolute increase of ≥5 mm from the nadir. While these dual criteria enhance diagnostic accuracy, their simultaneous application poses several challenges, including the complexity of lesion tracking and potential ambiguity in assessing progression for smaller target lesions. This study presents Enaworu's 25 mm nadir rule, a novel and standardised approach designed to streamline the assessment of target lesion progression. According to this rule, lesions with a nadir of less than 25 mm progress based solely on an absolute increase of 5 mm, whereas lesions with a nadir of 25 mm or more will progress based solely on a 20% increase from the nadir, thereby eliminating the necessity of applying both criteria concurrently. A simulated dataset comprising 1,000 patients, with nadir tumour sizes varying from 0.03 mm to 69.96 mm, was employed to compare progression classification under RECIST 1.1 and the 25 mm nadir rule. The results indicated identical classification outcomes, with 255 patients (25.5%) satisfying the progression criteria under both methodologies. The simplified rule maintained diagnostic accuracy while alleviating administrative burdens and enhancing clarity. The Enaworu's 25 mm nadir rule constitutes a practical refinement of RECIST 1.1, optimising workflow efficiency, reducing ambiguity, and ensuring consistency within clinical and research settings.

Indexed as

clinical trialslesion assessmentnadironcologyrecist 1.1target lesion progression

Identifiers

PMID40400881
PMCPMC12094296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.