ArticleCureus2025
Decoding Food Labels: A Study on the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Young Medical Students in Chennai.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The knowledge-behavior gap in nutritional literacy and its associations with chronic disease in older adults: a mediation analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Food package labels play a crucial role in promoting healthy dietary choices by providing essential nutritional information. Medical students, as future healthcare professionals, must be well-informed about food labeling to guide patients in making healthier choices. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) regarding food package labels among Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students in Chennai, South India. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 425 undergraduate medical students. Participants were selected by their year of study using a stratified random sampling method. Data were collected using a structured, pre-tested questionnaire covering socio-demographics and KAP related to food package labels. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), employing descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, and Kendall's tau correlation to determine associations between variables. Results About 57% of the participants were females. A majority (96.9%) acknowledged the presence of food labels, and 86.1% understood their purpose. However, only 27.5% reported reading food labels regularly. While 65.2% demonstrated good knowledge, only 54.4% exhibited poor attitudes toward food labels despite recognizing their importance and 53% actively applied this knowledge in purchasing decisions. Female students had better knowledge (66.1% vs. 63.9%, p=0.02), but a more negative attitude compared to males (58.7% vs. 48.6%, p=0.01). Kendall's tau correlation showed a significant positive relationship between KAP scores. Conclusion The findings of this study reveal a significant gap between knowledge and actual utilization of food package labels among MBBS students in Chennai. A relatively low percentage of students reported regularly reading labels or incorporating nutritional information into their purchasing decisions, indicating a disconnect between awareness and application. Furthermore, while female students showed a higher level of knowledge compared to their male counterparts, they also exhibited a more negative attitude toward the importance and utility of food labels. This knowledge-practice gap suggests that mere awareness is insufficient to influence health-conscious behavior and that underlying perceptions and motivations play a critical role in translating knowledge into practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.