Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400857›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Exploring the Ethical Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study.

Nadim El Khoury, Dima Hadid, Abbass El-Outa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nadim El KhouryResearch Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, FRA.
Dima HadidHealth Policy, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN.
Abbass El-OutaClinical Research, Observe Group for Clinical Research, Beirut, LBN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) in dentistry offers exciting prospects, alongside notable ethical hurdles. As AI capabilities advance, it is essential to comprehend the implications for dental practices, patient well-being, and the dentist-patient connection. This study aims to explore the ethical considerations and challenges associated with the use of AI in dentistry. Methods A web-based survey was conducted among dentists to gain a deeper understanding of their thoughts, experiences, and concerns regarding the implementation of AI in dental practice. The survey explored various aspects such as the ethical implications of AI, its effects on the relationship between dentists and patients, and the significance of human supervision in AI-assisted decision-making. Results The results of the study underscore the intricate ethical considerations that must be taken into account when incorporating AI technology into dental care. Dental professionals conveyed a preference for AI to serve as a supplement to human expertise, rather than a replacement, underscoring the significance of retaining human oversight and direction. Various concerns were raised regarding the potential for AI to influence clinical judgments, the importance of transparency in AI algorithms, and the necessity of safeguarding patient information. Nevertheless, the participants acknowledged the potential benefits of AI in improving diagnostic precision, treatment planning, and administrative efficacy. Conclusion The utilization of AI in dentistry is undoubtedly advantageous, but its implementation must be handled with care and balance. To achieve this, it is crucial to adhere to ethical standards, maintain a continuous commitment to professional education, and prioritize the preservation of the dentist-patient relationship. AI should be viewed as a tool that complements the dentist's expertise, with human judgment remaining paramount in clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical decision-makingdentist-patient relationshipdeontologylarge language modelmedical ethics

Identifiers

PMID40400857
PMCPMC12093131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.