Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400823›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Pericardial Agenesis: The Significance of Multimodality Imaging in Diagnosis.

Mehak Gupta, Tom Butler, Anikethana Appaji, Chun Shing Kwok

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mehak GuptaCardiology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke on Trent, GBR.
Tom ButlerMedicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, GBR.
Anikethana AppajiCardiology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke on Trent, GBR.
Chun Shing KwokCardiology, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Crewe, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pericardial agenesis is a rare pericardial defect that can be complete or partial. Often an incidental finding, most patients are asymptomatic at time of detection but some can present with symptoms of atypical chest pain, dyspnoea, palpitations or dizziness. There can be a delay in diagnosis as imaging is essential to confirm the diagnosis although there may be subtle signs on radiographic imaging and electrocardiogram. Both cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography can be used to diagnose the condition and distinguish between complete and partial pericardial agenesis, although cardiac magnetic resonance has been suggested as the investigation of choice. Recognition of the condition is important as it poses a risk of complications, particularly in those with partial pericardial agenesis. Most asymptomatic patients with complete pericardial agenesis are managed conservatively. In this case report, we describe a case of a 45-year-old woman who presented with pleuritic chest pain and haemoptysis who was found to have complete pericardial agenesis on workup.

Indexed as

cardiac magnetic resonance imagingcomputed tomographyincidental findingsmultimodality imagingpericardial agenesis

Identifiers

PMID40400823
PMCPMC12094492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.