Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400819›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Comparison of Outcomes of Internal Fixation Using Double-Angle Blade Plate Versus Double-Angle Dynamic Hip Screw With Pauwels Osteotomy in Neglected Fracture of the Neck of Femur.

Spandan Mishra, Shivam Chawla, Sunit Pani, Tapan K Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Spandan MishraOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Institute of Medical Sciences (IMS) and Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University Medical (SUM) Hospital, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Shivam ChawlaOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Institute of Medical Sciences (IMS) and Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University Medical (SUM) Hospital, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Sunit PaniOrthopaedics, Institute of Medical Sciences (IMS) and Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University Medical (SUM) Hospital, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Tapan K DasOrthopaedics, Institute of Medical Sciences (IMS) and Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University Medical (SUM) Hospital, Bhubaneswar, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Fracture of the neck of the femur is a significant orthopaedic injury with high morbidity and mortality rates, particularly among the elderly following low-velocity trauma. The complications of osteonecrosis and non-union are common in cases treated with any procedure of osteosynthesis. Surgical intervention through internal fixation is a common approach. Numerous procedures have been described for salvaging the femoral head to avoid or delay hip replacement in patients younger than 60 years. Operative methods to enhance vascularity and achieve healing at the fracture site include fixation with bone grafting, pedicle grafts to provide blood supply, or valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy. This paper compares the outcomes of two internal fixation techniques, double-angle blade plate (DABP) and double-angle dynamic hip screw (DHS) with Pauwels osteotomy, in the treatment of fracture neck of femur. We assess the outcomes based on functional recovery, complication rates, and overall patient satisfaction. Materials and methods Cases were selected from patients attending the OPD and Trauma Unit of IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneshwar, from 2022 to 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: one group underwent internal fixation with a DABP, and the other group underwent fixation with a double-angle DHS with Pauwels osteotomy. All patients with a diagnosed fracture neck of femur who underwent internal fixation with either a DABP or double-angle DHS with Pauwels osteotomy, aged 17-60 years, and with a delay in presentation of more than three weeks, were included in the study. Patients aged over 60 years, with fresh fractures, pathological fractures, multiple fractures, or prior surgery on the affected hip, were excluded. Results A total of 30 patients were included in the study, with 16 in the DABP group and 14 in the double-angle DHS group. Both groups demonstrated improvement in Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 6-month and 12-month follow-ups, but the double-angle DHS group showed a slightly higher HHS, indicating faster functional recovery. The angle blade plate showed better stability and less bone removal. It allowed room for fibular grafting and early mobilization due to reliable fixation. However, it was technically more difficult to perform and was a less forgiving implant than DHS, which is technically simpler and provides compression at the fracture site. Healing time was similar in both groups. Overall, the results were markedly satisfactory, with good functional outcomes, active painless hip range of motion, and painless weight-bearing, with acceptable shortening in these cases managed with either double-angle DHS or DABP, each with some shortcomings. Conclusion This study concluded that Pauwels osteotomy and fixation with a double-angle DHS provided the patient with a relatively higher success rate concerning union, with acceptable limb length discrepancy and better functional outcomes in young adults with neglected fracture neck of femur. It serves as a head-salvaging procedure in properly selected patients.

Indexed as

double-angle blade platedouble-angle dhsfemur fractureinternal fixationnon-unionpauwels osteotomy

Identifiers

PMID40400819
PMCPMC12093418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.