ReviewTrauma surgery & acute care open2025
Invasive and non-invasive monitoring in the ICU.
Review in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of aromatherapy on objective physiological outcomes in adult ICU patients: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The Right Ventricle in Cardiac Critical Care: Pathophysiology, Evaluation and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Urinary Cells Flow Cytometry in Renal Disease: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective invasive and non-invasive monitoring, when coupled with good clinical decision making, can improve outcomes for critically ill patients. When deciding on the best monitoring technique, it is important to consider the specific information that is needed to guide critical care management, while balancing the reliability of the data obtained and the risks of invasive monitor placement. Here, we review invasive and non-invasive options for hemodynamic and neurologic monitoring in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit. Understanding how each monitoring device functions, its indications, risks, and limitations is key when deciding how to monitor bedside physiologic data that guide clinical decision making. Level of evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.