Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400651›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Comparative Study on Subcutaneous Negative Suction Drain vs. No Drain in Emergency Laparotomy Wounds for Peritonitis.

Bhaskar Mallaiah, Bhavana Chinmayee K, Ramachandra J

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bhaskar MallaiahGeneral Surgery, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru, IND.
Bhavana Chinmayee KSurgery, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru, IND.
Ramachandra JGeneral Surgery, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bengaluru, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of subcutaneous negative suction drainage vs. no drainage in reducing postoperative complications following emergency laparotomy for peritonitis. Objective The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of subcutaneous negative pressure closure on various postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing emergency surgery. Specifically, the study aims to assess its impact on the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI), wound dehiscence, the need for secondary suturing, and the duration of hospital stay. Additionally, the study seeks to determine whether the observed SSIs are primarily attributable to intra-abdominal infections or are a result of hospital-acquired cross infections. Materials and methods A prospective comparative study was conducted on 60 patients diagnosed with peritonitis who underwent emergency laparotomy. They were randomly assigned into two groups of 30 patients each: Group A (with subcutaneous negative suction drain) and Group B (without drain). In Group A, drain fluid was analyzed for infection characteristics, while wound discharge from both groups was assessed microbiologically, where present. Results Group A included 21 males (70%) and nine females (30%), while Group B had 26 males (86%) and four females (13%). Midline vertical incisions were used in 90% of cases, with the remaining 10% receiving right paramedian incisions. Discharge from the incision site was observed in five patients (16%) in Group A and 13 patients (43%) in Group B (p = 0.024). SSIs occurred in five patients (16.67%) in Group A and in eight patients (26%) in Group B. Seroma formation was observed in five patients (16.67%) in Group B, but none in Group A. No significant differences were noted in wound dehiscence, need for secondary suturing, or duration of hospital stay between the groups. Conclusion Subcutaneous negative suction drainage significantly reduced the incidence of SSI, seroma formation, and discharge from the incision site following emergency laparotomy for peritonitis. This may lower the risk of wound complications and postoperative morbidity. Further randomized controlled trials are recommended to validate these findings.

Indexed as

emergency laparotomyperitonitissubcutaneous drainssubcutaneous negative pressure closuresurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID40400651
PMCPMC12092951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.