ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Machine learning models for predicting survival in lung cancer patients undergoing microwave ablation.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Derived Risk Groups and Clinical Implementation of Survival Prediction in Lung Cancer: Evidence from a Kazakh National Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable AI for Predicting Mortality Risk in Metastatic Cancer: Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Metastatic Dataset.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate predictive models assessing survival outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with microwave ablation (MWA), enabling clinical decision support and personalized care. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 181 NSCLC patients who underwent MWA between May 2013 and May 2023. Prognostic factors were identified through univariate analysis, and predictive models were constructed using machine learning techniques. The model validation was conducted using cross-validation to ensure the model's robustness and generalizability. Results: Univariate analysis revealed several significant prognostic factors, including tumor stage, serum phosphorus levels, patient age, average hemoglobin levels, ground-glass opacities (GGO), and pleural traction. The presence of GGO and pleural traction was associated with worse prognosis, and these factors were incorporated into the model. After training, the best-performing model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.742, demonstrating a good balance between sensitivity and specificity. Cross-validation and external validation further confirmed the robustness and generalizability of the model, with similar AUC values observed in both validation cohorts. The model effectively predicted the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for NSCLC patients treated with MWA. These findings suggest that the model can serve as a reliable tool for clinical decision-making and support individualized treatment strategies. Conclusion: The developed predictive model effectively assesses prognosis in NSCLC patients treated with MWA, supporting individualized treatment strategies and improving clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.