SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Clevidipine for the management of hypertension in the perioperative cardiac and noncardiac surgical settings: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of Clevidipine for blood pressure control after carotid endarterectomy: a prospective cohort study.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Clevidipine versus nitroglycerin for blood pressure control during carotid endarterectomy: a cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Perioperative hypertension is a common occurrence in anesthetic practice, potentially leading to cardiac complications resulting in unfavorable patient outcomes. Clevidipine emerges in the current drug scenario as an antihypertensive agent with advantageous properties like ultra-short half-life, titratable effect, and ease of use. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar databases was performed aided by a specific search string, to provide a synthesis of the available body of literature regarding clevidipine administration for the management of hypertension in the perioperative cardiac and noncardiac surgical settings. Results: Eighteen documents (summarizing data from 2,066 patients) published between 1997 and 2023 were included in the present review. Clevidipine was extensively compared to both placebo and other commonly used antihypertensive medications. Discussion: Clevidipine demonstrated favorable efficacy and promising safety profiles. Moreover, it may represent a promising aid for the intraoperative management of hypertension, and a valuable addition to traditional antihypertensive drugs. However, significant gaps in research still persist, and further studies are warranted to better dissect its effects in frail populations and patients of different ethnicities. Systematic review protocol: PROSPERO (CRD42024568584).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.