SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Bibliometric analysis of tumor marker application in gastric cancer diagnosis from 2019 to 2024.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic implications of PD-L1 expression in gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 2018 and 2025.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Phosphorylated-EGFR and MMP7 upregulation in gastric cancer: Association with metastasis and poor prognosis.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Near-Infrared-II Fluorescence Imaging of Tumors with Organic Small-Molecule Fluorophores.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Plasma IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 as predictors of response to PD-1 blockade immunochemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastric cancer remains a significant global health challenge, ranking fifth worldwide in both incidence and mortality worldwide. Early detection and accurate prognosis are crucial for effective management, yet current diagnostic methods, including tumor markers, often exhibit less sensitivity. This bibliometric analysis investigates trends and key contributions in research on tumor markers for gastric cancer diagnosis from 2019 to 2024. Using Scopus and Web of Science databases, 2,940 articles were analyzed to assess publication trends, prominent authors, institutions, and emerging research themes. Results highlight East Asia, particularly institutions like Fudan University and Nanjing Medical University, as a hub for groundbreaking research. The study identifies key tumor markers and advances in molecular diagnostics, with emphasis on personalized medicine and early detection strategies. Visualization of global collaborations reveals extensive networks driving innovation in this field. While this analysis underscores progress in gastric cancer biomarker research, it also identifies limitations, including language bias and a narrow temporal scope. Future research should prioritize novel biomarkers, integrate advanced technologies like AI, and enhance international cooperation to further improve outcomes for gastric cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.