ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2025
Development of a problem-solving ability learning model for children with intellectual disabilities.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Teachers' voices on sexuality in adolescents with intellectual disabilities: A phenomenological study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnhancing problem-solving abilities (PSA) in children with intellectual disabilities is critical for fostering independence and adaptive skills. The initial PCTL- model integrated phenomenon-based learning (PhBL), cognitive coaching (CC), task analysis (TA), and optimal learning environments (LE) to address the unique educational needs of this population. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study employed a two-phase approach. In phase 1, a conceptual framework for the PCTL model was synthesized through a systematic review of existing literature and an analysis of the teaching contexts specific to children with intellectual disabilities. In phase 2, the model was evaluated by eight educational experts specializing in curriculum design, assessment, special education, and technology. Quantitative ratings were collected to assess feasibility, utility, propriety, and accuracy, with an overall mean of 4.40 (SD = 0.51), indicating high appropriateness. Qualitative feedback was analyzed to refine the model, which was subsequently expanded and became the PCTL + PSA model.
resultsThe expert panel validated the PCTL model, emphasizing its comprehensive structure and practical applicability. The model after expert assessment and input was expanded to five key components for developing PSA. Moreover, PSA is identified as being involved in identifying problems, subdividing problems, analyzing and proposing solutions, evaluating methods, and assessing outcomes. Across all evaluation dimensions, the PCTL + PSA model achieved high scores, with the utility dimension rated the highest (mean = 4.69, SD = 0.49,
conclusionThis study introduces a validated and practical framework tailored to enhance problem-solving skills in children with intellectual disabilities. The final PCTL + PSA model contributes to inclusive education by addressing the unique learning needs of this population and providing actionable strategies for educators to improve classroom practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.