ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2025
Hospital performance evaluation models: A scoping review.
Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Integrated Multidimensional Framework for Hospital Performance Assessment: Design and Application in Romanian Public Hospitals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The novel additive star-NDEA model for hospital performance evaluation.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluating the performance of hospitals, the largest budget consumers of the health system, is challenging. This scoping review aimed to identify and classify hospital performance evaluation models and their dimensions. A literature search was conducted across three databases using keyword combinations. The studies included performance evaluation models along with evaluation of efficiency, effectiveness, and efficiency related to the hospital. Eighty English language studies published between 2012 and 2022, the majority from Iran, USA, Brazil, and China, were included. The extracted models were classified into two categories: quantitative and qualitative. The quantitative models were divided into two main groups: 'parametric' and 'non-parametric'. Parametric models were divided into four methods: regression models, stochastic frontier analysis, neural network models, and factor analysis. Non-parametric models can be classified into five groups: data envelopment analysis (DEA) models, multi-criteria decision-making methods, performance management models, service quality models, and other models. The DEA model, which includes extensive functions, was the most common model used for evaluating hospital performance. Quantitative models for evaluating hospital performance focused on performance and efficiency terms. A key priority for future research is to compare the extracted models with real data from different hospitals and provide the most useful model according to the contextual factors of the hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.