ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Reverse game: from Nash equilibrium to network structure, number and probability of occurrence.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reverse game: from Nash equilibrium to network structure, number and probability of occurrence.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a reverse game approach to network-modelled games to determine the network structure among players that can achieve a desired Nash equilibrium. We consider three types of network games: the majority game, the minority game and the best-shot public goods game. For any proposed Nash equilibrium, we identify the conditions and constraints of the network structure necessary to achieve that equilibrium in each game. Acceptable networks-i.e. networks that satisfy the assumed Nash equilibrium-are not unique, and their numbers grow exponentially based on the number of players and the combination of strategies. We provide mathematical relationships to calculate the exact number of networks that can create the specified Nash equilibrium in the best-shot public goods game. Additionally, in the majority and minority games, the relationships presented under special conditions specify the number of networks. We also investigate the distribution of acceptable networks as microsystems associated with the existing Nash equilibrium and their probability of occurrence. Our simulations indicate that the distribution of acceptable networks according to density follows a normal distribution, and their probability of occurrence increases. In other words, denser networks are more likely to lead to the desired Nash equilibrium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.