ReviewHemaSphere2025
Applications of machine learning for immunophenotypic measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia.
Review in HemaSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Putting the I in AML: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cells · 2026Review
- Review
- Molecular Pathology, Artificial Intelligence, and New Technologies in Hematologic Diagnostics: Translational Opportunities and Practical Considerations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Application and characterization of the multiple instance learning framework in flow cytometry.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Computational measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective validation in the HOVON-SAKK-132 trial.Leukemia · 2025Article
- Standardization of Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Flow Cytometry: A Multicenter Study.EJHaem · 2025Article
- An Update on Flow Cytometry Analysis of Hematological Malignancies: Focus on Standardization.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunophenotypic detection and quantification of residual leukemic cells by multiparameter flow cytometry is increasingly adopted in the clinical practice of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to assess measurable residual disease (MRD). However, MRD levels quantified by manual gating analysis can differ based on differences in gating strategy between trained operators and clinical centers. Manual gating requires extensive training, is time-consuming in daily practice, and faces a significant hurdle in analyzing data from next-generation cytometry platforms. To address these challenges, several computational approaches involving machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms have been proposed to automate or aid the assessment of MRD. However, the immunophenotypic variability between patients and the relatively low proportions of residual leukemic cells in AML challenge most algorithms and require innovative approaches. This review provides an overview of recent efforts in using computational methods for immunophenotypic AML-MRD assessment. We first explain the technical and conceptual background of the different algorithms that have been explored. Next, we discuss their strengths and limitations in the disease-specific context of AML. Finally, we highlight how computational approaches offer a unique opportunity to standardize or even outperform current manual gating analyses, and ultimately, improve the treatment of AML patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.