ReviewCritical reviews in toxicology2025
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): immunotoxicity at the primary sites of exposure.
Review in Critical reviews in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A conceptual framework linking health related costs of PFAS pollution to the polluter pays principle.iScience · 2026Article
- AOP-Based Analysis of Curated Transcriptomic Data Reveals a Context-Dependent Core Mechanism of PFAS-Induced Liver Steatosis.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Review
- Microplastics as Vectors Influencing Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Endocrine Function During Early Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Probiotic and Microbial Enzymatic Mechanisms for PFAS Detoxification.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Toxicological Effects and Health Impacts of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Humans.Toxics · 2026Review
- Pollutants regulate changes in pathological markers of neurodegenerative diseases: a new perspective in environmental toxicology.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Relationship between perfluoroalkyl substance exposure and immunoglobulin E among Korean adults from Korean National Environmental Health Survey cycle 4 (2018-2020): a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent synthetic chemicals widely used in industrial and consumer products, leading to environmental contamination and human exposure. This review focuses on perfluoroalkyl acids, a subset of PFAS, which are primarily encountered through diet, including drinking water, and other pathways such as dust ingestion, and dermal contact. Impaired vaccine antibody response has been identified as the most critical effect for risk assessment by the European Food Safety Authority. Furthermore, human epidemiological studies have linked exposure to certain PFAS to various immune-related outcomes, such as asthma, allergies, and inflammatory bowel disease. This review examines potential immunomodulatory effects of perfluoroalkyl acids at the primary sites of exposure: lungs, intestines, and skin, using human epidemiological data as the basis for investigating these impacts. While animal studies are referenced for context, this paper highlights the need for further human-based research to address key questions about PFAS and their immunological impacts. The state of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.