Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400421›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Streamlining Thoracic Radiotherapy Quality assurance: One-Class Classification for Automated OAR Contour Assessment.

Yihao Zhao, Cuiyun Yuan, Ying Liang, Yang Li, Chunxia Li, Man Zhao, Jun Hu, Ningze Zhong, Wei Liu, Chenbin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yihao ZhaoNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0009-0004-8565-7841
Cuiyun YuanNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Ying LiangNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yang LiNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0009-0008-5023-2711
Chunxia LiFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Man ZhaoNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jun HuSchool of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Ningze ZhongSchool of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0935-3999
Chenbin LiuNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2037-5630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeAutomating quality assurance (QA) for contours generated by automatic algorithms is critical in radiotherapy treatment planning. Manual QA is tedious, time-consuming, and prone to subjective experiences. Automatic segmentation reduces physician workload and improves consistency. However, an effective QA process for these automatic contours remains an unmet need in clinical practice.Materials and MethodsThe patient data used in this study was derived from the AAPM Thoracic Auto-Segmentation Challenge dataset, including left and right lungs, heart, esophagus, and spinal cord. Two groups of organ-at-risk (OAR) were generated. A ResNet-152 network was used as a feature extractor, and a one-class support vector machine (OC-SVM) was employed to classify contours as 'high' or 'low' quality. To evaluate the generalizability, we generated low-quality contours using translation and resizing techniques and assessed correlations between detection limits and metrics such as volume, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and mean surface distance (MSD).ResultsThe proposed OC-SVM model outperformed binary classifiers n metrics such as balanced accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) . It demonstrated superior performance in detecting various types of contour errors while maintaining high interpretability. Strong correlations were observed between detection limits and contour metrics.ConclusionOur proposed model integrates an attention mechanism with a one-class classification framework to automate QA for OAR delineations. This approach effectively detects diverse types of contour errors with high accuracy, significantly reducing the burden on physicians during radiotherapy planning.

Indexed as

Organs at RiskQuality Assurance, Health CareRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansSupport Vector Machinecontour delineation.one class classificationquality assuranceradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40400421
PMCPMC12099094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.