Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400379›Full record

SynthesisActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2025

Prognostic significance of surgical margins in open neck horizontal laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Erika Crosetti, Giovanni Succo, Maria Carraro, Giulia Arrigoni, Andrea Gallo, Giulio Pagliuca, Andy Bertolin, Andrea Elio Sprio, Giancarlo Pecorari, Marco De Vincentiis

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Is there a role for adjuvant radiotherapy after partial laryngectomy? A propensity score matched analysis.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2026
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Erika CrosettiOtorhinolaryngology Department - Head Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Giovanni SuccoOtorhinolaryngology Department - Head Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Maria CarraroOtorhinolaryngology Department - Head Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Giulia ArrigoniOtorhinolaryngology Department - Head Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Andrea GalloDepartment of Sensorial Organs, ENT Section, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giulio PagliucaOtolaryngology University Unit, "S.M. Goretti Hospital", Latina, Italy.
Andy BertolinOtolaryngology Unit, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Vittorio Veneto, Treviso, Italy.
Andrea Elio SprioDepartment of Research, ASOMI College of Sciences, Marsa, Malta.
Giancarlo PecorariDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Marco De VincentiisDepartment of Sense Organs, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Over the past two decades there has been a strategic shift in treating laryngeal cancer, with an increasing emphasis on preserving the anatomical structure and function of the larynx, even in cases of intermediate or advanced stages of disease. Open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHL) are widely adopted to spare the physiological functions of the larynx while achieving good oncological control. Positive, close or narrow surgical margins remain a critical prognostic factor, with their impact varying by tumour location and laryngeal subsite. This review examines the influence of positive margins on survival and the potential need for adjuvant treatments to optimise functional and oncological outcomes. Methods: This study adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Using the PICOS framework, it included studies on adults with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated by OPHL, focusing on survival and local control outcomes. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2023 was conducted and eligible studies were selected based on comprehensive inclusion criteria and screening of references. Results: The initial search yielded 675 articles from PubMed, 799 from EMBASE, and 33 from the Cochrane Library. After exclusions and duplicate removal, 57 full-text articles were reviewed, with 8 included for qualitative analysis and 7 for quantitative analysis. A total of 2,715 patients (age range, 16-87 years) were recruited across studies spanning from 2001 to 2021, all of which were retrospective. Among patients, 284 (10%) received neoadjuvant treatment and 627 (23%) underwent adjuvant therapy for positive margins, lymph node involvement and adverse pathological features. Seven studies assessed the association between margin status and recurrence, showing that close/positive margins significantly increased recurrence risk (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.99-3.87, p < 0.01), with no publication bias detected. Conclusions: This review highlights the challenges in defining and managing resection margins in OPHL for laryngeal cancer. While positive or close margins increase the risk of local recurrence, their effect on overall survival is unclear, emphasising the need for standardised protocols and individualised, multidisciplinary treatment planning.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellLaryngeal NeoplasmsLaryngectomyMargins of ExcisionHumansPrognosisfrozen sectionslaryngeal cancermarginsopen partial horizontal laryngectomyOPHL

Identifiers

PMID40400379
PMCPMC12115409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.