Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400378›Full record

SynthesisActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2025

Prognostic significance of surgical margins in laryngeal cancer treated by transoral laser microsurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Armando De Virgilio, Giulio Pagliuca, Elena Russo, Erika Crosetti, Giovanni Motta, Giorgio Peretti, Antonio Greco, Giovanni Succo, Marco de Vincentiis, Andrea Gallo

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Margin burden and postoperative management after transoral laser microsurgery for laryngeal glottic squamous cell carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study on 1216 patients.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Armando De VirgilioDepartment of Sense Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Giulio PagliucaOtorhinolaryngology University Unit, "S.M. Goretti Hospital", Latina, Italy.
Elena RussoDepartment of Sense Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Erika CrosettiOtorhinolaryngology Department - Head Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Giovanni MottaDepartment of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Giorgio PerettiIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Antonio GrecoDepartment of Sense Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Giovanni SuccoOtorhinolaryngology Department - Head Neck Cancer Unit, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Marco de VincentiisDepartment of Sense Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Andrea GalloDepartment of Sense Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the prognostic significance of surgical margins in patients undergoing transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar following PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing oncologic outcomes between positive and negative resection margins were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) for local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted and pooled using a random-effects model to account for inter-study variability. Results: A total of 26 studies, including 5,463 patients, met inclusion criteria. The pooled log-HR for DFS was 0.93 (p < 0.05), indicating a significantly higher risk of recurrence in patients with positive margins. However, no significant differences were observed for LC (log-HR = -0.76, p = 0.59) or OS (log-HR = 0.16, p = 0.40). Conclusions: While positive surgical margins significantly impact DFS, their effect on LC and OS remains uncertain. Further prospective studies are necessary to refine treatment guidelines and optimise oncologic outcomes.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellLaryngeal NeoplasmsLaser TherapyMargins of ExcisionMicrosurgeryHumansMouthPrognosislaryngeal squamous cell carcinomamarginsprognostic modelsurvivaltransoral laser microsurgery

Identifiers

PMID40400378
PMCPMC12115403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.