Observational studyFuture oncology (London, England)2025
Multiple myeloma care, treatment patterns, and treatment durations in academic and community care settings.
Observational study in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Efficacy of Belantamab Mafodotin in Combination With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Versus Standards of Care in Patients With Third-Line or Later Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Front-line treatment approaches in multiple myeloma: real-world data from a community-based oncology network.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Emerging Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma in Argentina and Brazil: Insights from the TOTEMM Study in the Private Healthcare Sector.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Impact of social determinants of health on treatment patterns and outcomes in multiple myeloma.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimEvaluate multiple myeloma (MM) treatment patterns, healthcare utilization (HCRU), and costs from academic and community settings.
methodsThis observational study linked US MM insurance claims (1 April 2017-30 June 2022) with provider affiliations to evaluate patient characteristics and treatment durations across patient cohorts defined by care setting of treatment (academic only, community only, mixed [both]), as well as treatment patterns, HCRU, and costs of care (e.g. treatment, office visits, hospitalization) in each setting.
results3778 patients were included. By cohort (
conclusionImproved patient support is needed in community settings, where most MM care occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.