Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400266›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2025

Atypical Beta Oscillatory Dynamics Are Related to Poor Procedural Learning in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder.

Jarrad A G Lum, Kaila M Hamilton, Li-Ann Leow, Welber Marinovic, Ian Fuelscher, Pamela Barhoun, Talitha C Ford, Aron T Hill, Samaneh Nahravani, Melissa Kirkovski and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jarrad A G LumCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2098-2403
Kaila M HamiltonCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Li-Ann LeowSchool of Arts & Humanities, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
Welber MarinovicSchool of Population Health, Discipline of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Ian FuelscherCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Pamela BarhounCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Talitha C FordCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Aron T HillCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Samaneh NahravaniCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Melissa KirkovskiCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Peter G EnticottCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Christian HydeCognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Procedural learning difficulties are commonly reported in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD), yet the neural basis of this impairment remains unclear. This study addressed this gap by examining the correlation between cortical oscillatory activity and procedural learning of a sequence of finger movements in children with and without DCD. Participants were 19 children with DCD and 38 typically developing (TD) children, with a mean age of 10 years and 3 months. Children completed the Serial Reaction Time task, a standard measure of procedural learning, during which they unintentionally learned a sequence of finger movements. Electroencephalography (EEG) was continuously recorded as they performed the task. Behavioural analyses indicated poorer procedural learning in the DCD group compared to the TD group. EEG analyses revealed that beta activity over motor areas and theta/alpha activity over occipital areas were sensitive to procedural learning effects. Group differences were observed only in beta activity, with the DCD group showing reduced beta modulation relative to TD children. No significant group differences were found for theta or alpha activity. This study provides new evidence demonstrating an association between poor procedural learning and atypical beta oscillatory dynamics in DCD.

Indexed as

Beta RhythmLearningMotor Skills DisordersChildElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleReaction Timealphabetadevelopmental coordination disorder (DCD)electroencephalography (EEG)neural oscillationsprocedural learningserial reaction time (SRT) tasktheta

Identifiers

PMID40400266
PMCPMC12096045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.