ArticleThe New phytologist2025
The fitness effects of outcrossing distance depend on parental flowering phenology in fragmented populations of a tallgrass prairie forb.
Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The phenomena of isolation-by-distance and isolation-by-time shapecontra mating patterns and population genetic processes, such as inbreeding and outbreeding depression, which influence progeny fitness. However, the effects of parental isolation in time on offspring fitness remain understudied, especially in combination with isolation-by-distance. We planted offspring from a common garden experiment involving 13 populations of the tallgrass prairie forb Echinacea angustifolia into a prairie restoration and tracked their fitness over 16 yr. Parental source populations were up to 9 km apart, and flowering asynchronies spanned up to 13 d. Using Aster life-history analysis, we assessed how interparent distance and asynchrony affected offspring fitness. Interparent asynchrony modified the relationship between interparent distance and offspring fitness. Offspring with the highest fitness had parents from the most distant populations, with maternal plants flowering later than paternal plants. Notably, the order of parental flowering, rather than the absolute difference in timing, better predicted fitness. Nongenetic aspects of reproductive timing, such as morphological constraints, may have contributed to these effects. We suggest management strategies to promote outcrossing over space and time, including leveraging seed production environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.