ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2025
An Analysis for IDH-Mutant Grade 4 Astrocytoma Based on WHO CNS 5: Implication of Clinical Practice.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere is ongoing debate regarding the therapeutic approach and prognosis for IDH-mutant grade 4 astrocytoma, a newly defined subtype of diffuse glioma in the 2021 WHO classification system for central nervous system tumors (WHO CNS 5). The aim of this study was to explore the clinical outcome and prognosticators for newly diagnosed IDH-mutant grade 4 astrocytoma based on our single institutional data.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included 53 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed IDH-mutant grade 4 astrocytoma, who underwent radiotherapy between September 2021 and December 2023. All patients were administered concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Eleven patients received adjuvant tumor-treating fields (TTFields).
resultsThe median follow-up was 15.7 months. Twenty patients had tumor relapse; three patients died, all of whom were without TTFields therapy. The median PFS for the entire cohort was 19.3 months, and the median OS was not reached. Univariate analysis indicated patients younger than 40 years (p = 0.11) or without homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B (p = 0.11) tended to have better PFS. In addition, the TTFields group tended to have longer median PFS than the non-TTFields group in both analyses before and after propensity score matching (PSM) (24.4 vs. 18.5 months, p = 0.097, before PSM; 24.4 vs. 15.9 months, p = 0.080, after PSM). No significant independent prognostic factor was found in the multivariate analysis.
conclusionsThe study reveals important insights into clinical practice for IDH-mutant grade 4 astrocytoma. Younger age and tumor without deleted CDKN2A/B might be predictive of better outcomes. The addition of TTFields trended towards improved PFS, necessitating prospective clinical trials for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.