Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40400198›Full record

ArticleAnimal bioscience2025

Phuphan chicken breeds: classification as varieties or distinct breeds with three derivative groups using microsatellite genotyping.

Ekerette Ekerette, Nivit Tanglertpaibul, Trifan Budi, Wisut Auekingpetch, Chien Phuoc Tran Nguyen, Worapong Singchat, Wongsathit Wongloet, Nichakorn Kumnan, Piangjai Chalermwong, Anh Huynh Luu and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AncestralAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ekerette EkeretteAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nivit TanglertpaibulAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Trifan BudiAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wisut AuekingpetchPhuphan Royal Development Study Centre, Office of the Royal Development Projects Board (ORDPB), Sakhon Nakhon, Thailand.
Chien Phuoc Tran NguyenAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Worapong SingchatAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wongsathit WongloetAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nichakorn KumnanAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Piangjai ChalermwongAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anh Huynh LuuAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thitipong PanthumAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Aingorn ChaiyesSchool of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Kanithaporn VangnaiDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chotika YokthongwattanaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chomdao SinthuvanichAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Narongrit MuangmaiAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Prateep DuengkaeAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kornsorn SrikulnathAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

Betagro Group 6501.0901.1/68International SciKU BrandingKasetsart University FF(KU)25.64Kasetsart University FF(KU)51.67National Research Council of Thailand NRCT.MHESI/105/2564National Science and Technology Development Agency NSTDA FDACO-2563-11177-THPMU-B Board Committees B137660130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIndigenous and local breeds, such as Phuphan chickens, are vital due to their adaptability and nutritional value. However, the precise origin, historical records, and genetic diversity of Phuphan chickens remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate origin and genetic diversity of four Phuphan chicken groups from the Phuphan Royal Development Study Centre.

methodsThis study assesses four groups of Phuphan chicken: Phuphan black 1 (SK-B1), Phuphan black 2 (KU-BM/F), Phuphan white (KU-WM/F), and Phuphan color (KU-VM/F) using 28 microsatellite markers and comparing them with those of other Thai chicken breeds within "The Siam Chicken Bioresource Project" database.

resultsThe results highlighted significant genetic diversity among these groups (mean expected heterozygosity [He] = 0.623±0.014; Allelic richness [AR] = 4.594±0.124), indicating effective management through the breeding program of the Phuphan Royal Development Study Centre. Population structure analyses revealed distinct gene pools, emphasizing the genetic uniqueness of SK-B1 relative to the other three groups. Bayesian inference validated historical genetic exchanges, primarily among KU-BM/F, KU-WM/F, and KU-VM/F, with limited exchanges involving SK-B1. This suggests that the Phuphan chicken groups share a common lineage, primarily distinguished by variations in plumage color, resulting from residual selection processes. Microsatellite markers pinpointed the loci LEI0234, MCW206, MCW0016, MCW0222, MCW0098, MCW0165, and ADL0278 as potentially subject to directional selection and associated with plumage color variation among the Phuphan chicken groups. Comparative evaluations with other Thai indigenous local chickens and red junglefowl revealed a closer affinity of SK-B1 to existing Thai chicken breeds, suggesting it may represent a variant of these breeds. Alternatively, KU-BM/F, KU-WM/F, and KU-VM/F, which exhibited comparable external characteristics, may constitute a novel breed of Phuphan chicken.

conclusionThe findings may enhance understanding on genetic architecture of Phuphan chicken groups and contribute to Thailand's economic growth while preserving the genetic diversity of the indigenous chickens.

Indexed as

Black-boned ChickenBreedGenetic ClusterIndigenous ChickenMicrosatelliteVariety

Identifiers

PMID40400198
PMCPMC12415380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.