ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2025
Day-To-Day Endurance Training Periodization of World-Class Cross-Country Skiers.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the day-to-day endurance training periodization of male and female world-class cross-country skiers. Self-reported session-by-session training data from 17 (7 female) world-class cross-country skiers were retrospectively analyzed. The data were separated into general preparation (GP) and competition periods (CP), during which all skiers achieved world-class performance. Daily training volume was categorized as very low (0%-50% of mean daily volume), low (50%-100%), moderate (100%-150%), and high (≥ 150%). Training load (Training Impulse, TRIMP) was calculated as the product of duration and an intensity factor of 1, 2, or 3 for low-, moderate-, and high-intensity training, respectively. Training volume was distributed as 18%/22%/32%/28% across very low/low/moderate/high volume days during GP, whereas the corresponding distribution during CP was 23%/35%/32%/10%. Shifts in daily TRIMP from GP to CP mirrored changes in training volume. During GP, the acute-to-chronic work ratio (ACWR) was 0.75-1.25 on 69% of the days, with 13% of the days showing lower ratios and 18% higher. During CP, the corresponding values were 69%/19%/12%. Intensive sessions occurred every 3.6 ± 0.3 days during GP compared to every 3.0 ± 0.3 days during CP. Training volumes on the day before intensive sessions were 127 ± 13% (GP) and 99 ± 7% (CP) of the daily mean, whereas the corresponding values for the days after were 116 ± 8% and 87 ± 9%. These data provide new insights into day-to-day periodization in world-class cross-country skiers, highlighting the sequential application of training loads by alternating training days of high volume, elevated intensity every 3-4 days, or reduced training load or rest every 8-9 days, while only 5% combining volume and intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.