ArticleJournal of intensive care2025
Laxative use and 28-day mortality in critically ill sepsis patients: a retrospective cohort study using MIMIC-IV (v3.1).
Article in Journal of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study investigates the impact of four laxatives-Senna, Docusate Sodium, Polyethylene Glycol, and Lactulose on 28-day mortality, ICU-free days, ventilator-free days, bowel recovery, and Clostridium difficile (C-diff) infection in critically ill sepsis patients to identify optimal bowel management strategies for improving survival and recovery.
methodsUsing the MIMIC-IV database (v3.1), we analyzed 7163 ICU sepsis patients (median age: 67.5 years; 63% male), assessing 28-day mortality, ICU-free days, vasopressor-free days, ventilator-free days, bowel sound recovery, and C-diff incidence, with propensity score matching and multivariable adjustments for confounders, alongside subgroup analyses by sex, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score.
resultsDocusate Sodium was associated with significantly lower 28-day mortality (adjusted HR: 0.43; 95% CI 0.36-0.52), more ICU-free days, and better bowel recovery compared to Senna, while Lactulose was linked to higher mortality (adjusted HR: 1.82; 95% CI 1.45-2.27), fewer ICU-free days, and increased C. difficile risk, with subgroup analyses confirming these trends across sex, age, and comorbidity strata.
conclusionDocusate sodium appears to be a safer and more effective bowel management option for critically ill patients with sepsis. In contrast, the association between lactulose use and adverse outcomes may primarily reflect the severity of underlying liver disease rather than a direct drug effect. These findings underscore the importance of individualized laxative selection based on patients' clinical context in critical care practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.