ArticleTrials2025
A novel noninvasive assessment of portal pressure from computational biofluid mechanics in patients with portal hypertension.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsTo introduce and assess a novel method for portal pressure measurement based on biofluid mechanics in portal hypertensive patients undergoing surgery.
methodsThe research was a multi-center, retrospective study, conducted on patients who underwent surgery and measurement of free portal pressure (FPP). There were 118 patients included and 21 patients excluded due to the failure or poor results of Doppler ultrasound, and 97 patients were screened. We used patients' CT images, Doppler ultrasound results of the portal system, blood density and viscosity to reconstruct their portal system and simulate its internal blood flow. According to the patient's physical property, geometry, and boundary conditions, the Navier-Stokes equations were solved by FLUENT software, and virtual free portal pressure (vFPP) was calculated. Finally, the Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and the Lin's concordance correlation coefficient were performed to evaluate the numerical correlation between the vFPP and FPP.
resultsAll patients enrolled in this study underwent the surgery, and the FPP of patients was measured during the surgery, with a mean FPP of 22.8 ± 3.3 mmHg (range: 13-33 mmHg). Meanwhile, according to computational biofluid mechanics, all patients' vFPP was calculated. Then, we further explored whether there was a close relationship between vFPP and FPP in the whole population. For the analysis of Bland-Altman Limits of Agreement, the mean value of difference was - 0.1569 (95% CI: - 0.4305 to 0.1167); lower limit of agreement: - 2.8176 (95% CI: - 3.2868 to - 2.3484); upper limit of agreement: 2.5038 (95% CI: 2.0346 to 2.9730). The ICC was 0.9215 (95% CI: 0.8848 to 0.9468). Furthermore, the Lin's concordance correlation coefficient showed a numerical correlation between the vFPP and FPP, which was 0.9205 (95% CI: 0.8840 to 0.9459). All these results confirmed that our vFPP model could provide an accurate prediction of FPP in patients.
conclusionsThe vFPP of patients calculated by computational biofluid mechanics was significantly correlated with the FPP of portal hypertensive patients, which would be a novel, non-invasive, and accurate method for the assessment of portal pressure in surgical patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.