ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
A pilot study on alternative blood sampling methods in pigs.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving physiological monitoring and reporting standards in preclinical stroke research.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026Review
- Advancing One Health surveillance with non-invasive biomonitoring: a review of persistent pesticide exposure assessment using external keratinized animal tissue.One health outlook · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe collection of blood samples allows the monitoring of animal health and can be achieved by puncture or catheterization of specific veins. However, this process raises ethical concerns regarding animal welfare. As an alternative to traditional invasive blood collection methods, we tested the use of kissing bugs (Dipetalogaster maxima, a blood-sucking insect) and devices derived from human medicine, such as vascular imaging (VeinViewer
resultsAmong the methods, the catheter and insects were the least stressful, followed by the prick lancet, and the VeinViewer
conclusionsThese findings underscore the reliability of catheterization as the gold standard, although the prick lancet appears promising to reduce pig's stress. However, the method could be further refined, both in terms of animal acceptability and especially analytical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.