ArticleBMC medical education2025
Application and effectiveness of blended learning in medical imaging via the technology acceptance model.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virtual Reality-Based Training in Radiologic Technology for Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Brain Imaging: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blended learning, which integrates online education with face-to-face instruction, is becoming an increasingly vital component of higher education. While there is an extensive research on blended learning, studies specifically examining student perceptions in the field of medical imaging are limited. This study investigates the satisfaction and behavioral intentions of students enrolled in a blended "Medical Imaging" course at Hainan Medical University. We employed a quantitative research approach, using a modified Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) questionnaire to fit the specific context of blended learning. Data were collected from 145 valid responses and analyzed using SPSS 26 and Smart-PLS 3.3.3. The findings reveal that blended learning positively impacts student satisfaction and engagement, underscoring its value in higher education. Additionally, the study supports the integration of the TAM to enhance the effectiveness of blended learning for students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.