SynthesisRadiation oncology (London, England)2025
Stereotactic radiosurgery in pituitary metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pituitary gland is an infrequent site for metastasis, encompassing approximately 0.4% of all intracranial metastatic lesions. The prognosis of pituitary metastasis (PM) remains dismal despite considerable advances in therapeutic interventions. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been increasingly utilized as a minimally invasive therapeutic option for PMs. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of SRS in patients with PMs.
methodsOn November 26, 2024, a systematic search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies that have evaluated the role of SRS in PMs or PMs with cavernous sinus invasion were included. The meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, publication bias evaluation, and meta-regression were conducted using the R program.
resultsSeven studies with 79 individuals with PMs were included. The results showed a pooled local control (LC) rate of 92% (95%CI:83-98%) following intervention. The analysis resulted in a pooled diabetes insipidus (DI) improvement rate of 42% (95%CI:0-100%) and cranial nerve (CN) dysfunction improvement rate of 77% (95%CI:49-98%). In contrast, none of the patients with anterior pituitary dysfunction experienced improvement. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled ARE rate of 2% (95%CI:0-7%) with low heterogeneity (I
conclusionSRS is correlated with promising improvement in LC, OS, and CN dysfunction in patients with PM. On the other hand, SRS is accompanied by limited effectiveness in DI and improvement in anterior pituitary dysfunction due to irreversible damage to the pituitary cells by metastatic lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.