ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2025
Preoperative evaluation of alcohol consumption in older patients.
Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis sub-analysis of the PROPDESC-study (Pre-Operative Prediction of postoperative delirium by appropriate Screening-study) evaluated the alcohol consumption of older patients with two different assessment tools (single sentence question and Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C)) and compared the results in regards to detection, reliability, and quantification of patient´s alcohol consumption.
methodsDuring their anesthesiological pre-clinic visit 1084 patients older than 59 years were asked whether they consume alcohol daily and 668 of them additionally answered the AUDIT-C questionnaire.
resultsAccording to the SSQ 11.72% of the patients consumed alcohol daily. In the AUDIT-C sub-group 25.90% reported moderate to high alcohol consumption while infrequent or very low alcohol intake was reported by 41.92%. In the subgroup 31.89% of the patients stated alcohol abstinence. About one quarter (25.13%) of patients who denied daily alcohol intake but scored positive on the AUDIT-C displayed levels of alcohol consumption ranging from moderate (11.20%) to high (13.87%) according to the AUDIT-C.
conclusionReliable information about alcohol consumption is related to the method of questioning. The AUDIT-C evaluates the patient´s alcohol intake precisely and identifies more older patients with possibly health- and surgery-relevant alcohol consumption levels. The validated AUDIT-C provides an objective assessment to the physician during the pre-clinic anesthesiologic consultation. Additionally, handing out a questionnaire to the patient encourages initiative and self-assessment and could also relieve both, the physician and the patient from sensing a moral evaluation of alcohol consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.