ArticleArthritis research & therapy2025
Early prediction of bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis through machine learning analysis of plasma metabolites.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Nanozymes in Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment Through Disease Stage-Oriented Strategies.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Pathological characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine Shi Zheng and related therapeutic formula, effective compounds: a general review.Chinese medicine · 2025Review
- Tongue feature-based model for assessing disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of response to Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using clinical data.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo develop a predictive model for bone destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), based on the characteristics of plasma metabolites and common clinical indicators.
methodsThe cohort comprised 60 patients with RA, with baseline metabolite features identified using the liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometer system. Radiographic outcomes were assessed using the van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score (mTSS) following a one-year follow-up period to quantify bone destruction. The longitudinal association between metabolites and radiographic progression was analyzed using several machine learning algorithms, and the significance of core metabolites was calculated. A new model incorporating metabolites and clinical indicators was created to evaluate its predictive performance for radiographic progression; the model was compared with other prediction models.
resultsThe median increase in mTSS was 3.50. Of the 774 detected metabolites, 77 differed between patients with different outcomes. Core metabolites identified using the Gaussian Naive Bayes algorithm included mangiferic acid, O-acetyl-L-carnitine, 5,8,11-eicosatrienoic acid, and 16-methylheptadecanoic acid. A standardized bone erosion risk score (BERS) was developed based on these core metabolite features for assessing the radiographic progression outcome. Individuals with a high BERS exhibited a lower risk of rapid radiographic progression than those with a lower score (OR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.01-0.03, P = 0.003). The "China-Japan Friendship Hospital-BERS Model" (CjBM), combining BERS with clinical features (methotrexate and C-reactive protein), produced an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.800. Moreover, compared with the reported models, the CjBM showed near statistical significance in identifying rapid radiographic progression; adding BERS can improve the discrimination of the original reported model (P
conclusionsThe CjBM was developed for early prediction of bone destruction in patients with RA, and the evaluation of BERS emphasizes the significance of metabolite features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.