ArticleBMC medical genomics2025
RNAcare: integrating clinical data with transcriptomic evidence using rheumatoid arthritis as a case study.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGene expression analysis is a crucial tool for uncovering the biological mechanisms that underlie differences between patient subgroups, offering insights that can inform clinical decisions. However, despite its potential, gene expression analysis remains challenging for clinicians due to the specialised skills required to access, integrate, and analyse large datasets. Existing tools primarily focus on RNA-Seq data analysis, providing user-friendly interfaces but often falling short in several critical areas: they typically do not integrate clinical data, lack support for patient-specific analyses, and offer limited flexibility in exploring relationships between gene expression and clinical outcomes in disease cohorts. Users, including clinicians with a general knowledge of transcriptomics, however, who may have limited programming experience, are increasingly seeking tools that go beyond traditional analysis. To overcome these issues, computational tools must incorporate advanced techniques, such as machine learning, to better understand how gene expression correlates with patient symptoms of interest.
resultsOur RNAcare platform, addresses these limitations by offering an interactive and reproducible solution specifically designed for analysing transcriptomic data from patient samples in a clinical context. This enables researchers to directly integrate gene expression data with clinical features, perform exploratory data analysis, and identify patterns among patients with similar diseases. By enabling users to integrate transcriptomic and clinical data, and customise the target label, the platform facilitates the analysis of the relationships between gene expression and clinical symptoms like pain and fatigue. This allows users to generate hypotheses and illustrative visualisations/reports to support their research. As proof of concept, we use RNAcare to link inflammation-related genes to pain and fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and detect signatures in the drug response group, confirming previous findings.
conclusionWe present a novel computational platform allowing the interpretation of clinical and transcriptomics data in real-time. The platform can be used for data generated by the user, such as the patient data presented here or using published datasets. The platform is available at https://rna-care.mvls.gla.ac.uk/ , and its source code is https://github.com/sii-scRNA-Seq/RNAcare/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.