Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40399845›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2025

Open radical cystectomy and ileal loop diversion under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for the elderly and frail.

Sahin Kilic, Tayfun Sugur, Hayri Fatih Metinyurt, Yigit Demir, Eray Ozturk, Murat Sambel

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sahin KilicDepartment of Urology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Muratpasa, 07100, Antalya, Turkey. sahinkilic84@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2458-1893
Tayfun SugurDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Muratpasa, 07100, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2965-4601
Hayri Fatih MetinyurtDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Muratpasa, 07100, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7446-0884
Yigit DemirDepartment of Urology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Muratpasa, 07100, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5741-5061
Eray OzturkDepartment of Urology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Muratpasa, 07100, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5776-7787
Murat SambelDepartment of Urology, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Muratpasa, 07100, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3069-7078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between prolonged general anaesthesia duration in radical cystectomy (RC) and increased complication rates is well established. This study compared clinical outcomes of open RC performed under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (CSEA) versus general anaesthesia in elderly and frail patients.

methodsA retrospective evaluation was conducted on data from patients who underwent open RC at our institution between February 2023 and October 2024. Patients with missing data or previous open abdominal surgery, who underwent additional surgical intervention during RC, or who underwent different urinary diversions from ileal loop diversion were excluded. The study comprised two cohorts, designated as CSEA and general anaesthesia groups. Various demographics, including age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, pre-and postoperative blood values, operative times, estimated blood loss, and recovery parameters, were retrospectively analyzed.

resultsThe CSEA group had a higher mean age than the general anaesthesia group (72.40 ± 9.79 vs. 64.40 ± 10.70 years, p = 0.098), though this difference was not statistically significant. BMI values were similar for both groups (25.50 ± 2.80 and 25.34 ± 4.20 kg/m², p = 0.922). The prevalence of comorbidities was significantly higher in the CSEA group (100% vs. 40%, p = 0.011). The mean preoperative albumin level was lower in the CSEA group (3.23 ± 0.68 vs. 3.97 ± 0.51 mg/dL, p = 0.013). Duration of surgery, estimated blood loss and need for blood transfusion were similar between both groups (p > 0.05). Postoperative oral feeding initiation time was significantly earlier in the CSEA group (1 day and 3 days, p < 0.001). Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were significantly lower in the CSEA group (3.0 vs. 4.6, p = 0.004). The number of lymph node removals was significantly higher in the CSEA group (28.80 ± 7.77 vs. 12.90 ± 7.13, p < 0.001). Locally advanced disease rate was more common in the CSEA group (80% vs. 20%, p < 0.010). However, Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ III complication rates and length of hospitalization were similar between the groups (p > 0.05).

conclusionsOpen RC under CSEA is a preferable option for elderly patients and those with comorbidities who are not suitable for general anaesthesia. It offers advantages in postoperative bowel function recovery and pain management compared with general anaesthesia.

trial registrationretrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, SpinalCystectomyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary DiversionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFrail ElderlyHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesAnaesthesiaBladder cancerEpiduralRadical cystectomySpinal

Identifiers

PMID40399845
PMCPMC12096728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.