ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Chewing gum on postoperative oral Malodor in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a randomized non-inferiority trial.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to determine whether preoperative chewing gum is non-inferior to Chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash in reducing halitosis in patients undergoing elective general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
methodsWe conducted a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority controlled trial involving patients undergoing surgery requiring endotracheal intubation for ≤ 3 h. Participants were randomly assigned to either the CHX mouthwash group (Group M) or the chewing gum group (Group N). Thirty minutes before general anesthesia, patients in Group M rinsed their mouths with 10 ml of CHX mouthwash, while those in Group N chewed Trident mint gum. The primary outcome was the incidence of halitosis in both groups, assessed before endotracheal intubation and at extubation.
resultsA total of 733 patients were included, with 365 patients in Group M and 368 patients in Group N. The incidence of halitosis in both groups was significantly reduced compared to baseline. Before extubation, the improvement in halitosis was greater in Group N than in Group M (P < 0.05). After extubation, the improvement in halitosis in Group N was non-inferior to that in Group M (Z = 1.96, 95% CI: -0.0898 to 0.0944, p = 0.0023).
conclusionsIn patients undergoing elective general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, chewing gum was found to be non-inferior to CHX mouthwash in improving postoperative halitosis.
trial registrationChictr.org.cn ChiCTR2400082035 (date of registration: 19/03/2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.