Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40399814›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Benchmarking the pediatric quality of life (PedsQL) cancer module in a large Dutch national cohort of childhood cancer patients.

Elin Irestorm, Anne Bakker, Wim J E Tissing, Heleen Maurice-Stam, Natasja Dors, Annelies Mavinkurve-Groothuis, Sabine L A Plasschaert, Kelly L A van Bindsbergen, Martha A Grootenhuis, Raphaele R L van Litsenburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elin IrestormFaculty of Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Anne BakkerPrincess Máxima Center for pediatric oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wim J E TissingPrincess Máxima Center for pediatric oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Heleen Maurice-StamPrincess Máxima Center for pediatric oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Natasja DorsPrincess Máxima Center for pediatric oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Annelies Mavinkurve-GroothuisPrincess Máxima Center for pediatric oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sabine L A PlasschaertPrincess Máxima Center for pediatric oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kelly L A van BindsbergenPrincess Máxima Center for pediatric oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martha A GrootenhuisPrincess Máxima Center for pediatric oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Raphaele R L van LitsenburgPrincess Máxima Center for pediatric oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands. r.r.l.vanlitsenburg@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl.

Funding

Stichting Kinderen Kankervrij,The Netherlands 416Vetenskapsrådet 2021-00328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric cancer diagnosis and treatment reduce Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). The Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Cancer Module is the most commonly used cancer specific HRQoL instrument, but most studies included relatively small cohorts and no reference scores are available. The development of a PedsQL Cancer Module benchmark, based on a large population of pediatric cancer patients, may benefit future research by providing insight into issues children encounter during treatment or clinical trials. A benchmark would also allow for earlier identification of patients who may benefit from targeted interventions in HRQoL monitoring programs. The primary aim of this study was therefore to provide benchmark scores from a large national cohort for use in pediatric oncology care and research. Secondary aims were to compare scores between subgroups (age, sex, and diagnosis group) and to describe the prevalence of impaired HRQoL.

methodsData was collected from a national HRQoL monitoring program and extracted from medical records. HRQoL was measured with the PedsQL Cancer Module during treatment for childhood cancer, approximately 3 months after diagnosis. Comparisons were made for sex, age and diagnosis groups: hemato-oncology (HO), central nervous system-tumors (CNS), and solid tumors (ST) using the Mann-Whitney U test for the different subscales. Effect sizes were calculated. Impairment was defined on item level using descriptive statistics.

resultsProxy-reports of 492 children (age 2-7 years) and self-reports of 500 children (age 8-18 years) were available. HRQoL differences between age groups, sex and diagnosis groups were small, with the exception of nausea. On the nausea subscale there was a medium effect size difference with children with ST reporting more problems than children with CNS. Impaired HRQoL was most often reported on items reflecting nausea and procedural anxiety.

conclusionsEarly in the cancer trajectory, there are only minor differences between subgroups based on age, sex, and diagnosis group. These results from a large national cohort can be used as benchmark data in future clinical trials, studies and clinical assessments, and offer and adapt support targeted for improving HRQoL related to treatment for childhood cancer.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingNeoplasmsQuality of LifeAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsSurveys and QuestionnairesBenchmark or reference valuesCancer treatmentChildhood cancer(Health-Related) Quality of LifePedsQL Cancer ModuleSymptom

Identifiers

PMID40399814
PMCPMC12096553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.