ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
scHiCSRS: a self-representation smoothing method with Gaussian mixture model for imputing single cell Hi-C data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ssJSD: A Fusion of Sparsity and Spatial Information for HiC Single-Cell Clustering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- szKendall: spatial-structural-zero-aware dissimilarity measures for subtype discovery using single cell Hi-C data.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSingle cell Hi-C (scHi-C) techniques make it possible to study cell-to-cell variability, but excess of zeros are makes scHi-C matrices extremely sparse and difficult for downstream analyses. The observed zeros are a combination of two events: structural zeros for which two loci never interact due to underlying biological mechanisms, or dropouts (sampling zeros) where two loci interact but not captured due to insufficient sequencing depth. Although data quality improvement approaches have been proposed, little has been done to differentiate these two types of zeros, even though such a distinction can greatly benefit downstream analysis such as clustering.
resultsWe propose scHiCSRS, a self-representation smoothing method that improves data quality, and a Gaussian mixture model that identifies structural zeros among observed zeros. scHiCSRS not only takes spatial dependencies of a scHi-C data matrix into account but also borrows information from similar single cells. Through an extensive set of simulation studies, we demonstrate the ability of scHiCSRS for identifying structural zeros with high sensitivity and for accurate imputation of dropout values in sampling zeros. Downstream analyses for three experimental datasets show that data improved from scHiCSRS yield more accurate clustering of cells than simply using observed data or improved data from comparison methods.
conclusionIn summary, scHiCSRS provides a valuable tool for identifying structural zeros and imputing dropouts. The resulted data are improved for downstream analysis, especially for understanding cell-to-cell variation through subtype clustering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.