Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40399748›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Episodic memory and semantic knowledge interact to guide eye movements during visual search in scenes: Distinct effects of conscious and unconscious memory.

Michelle M Ramey, John M Henderson, Andrew P Yonelinas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle M RameyDepartment of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA. mmramey@uark.edu.
John M HendersonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Andrew P YonelinasDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

Funding

Guiding Attention in Real-World ScenesR01EY027792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI John M Henderson · 2017 to 2026
$2.5M
Plasticity, Perception, and the Medial Temporal LobesR01EY025999 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI YONELINAS, ANDREW P · 2016 to 2022
$2.3M
Visual perception and the medial temporal lobesR01EY035249 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Andrew P Yonelinas · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences 2313703NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025999NEI NIH HHS R01EY025999NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027792NEI NIH HHS R01EY027792NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Episodic memory and semantic knowledge can each exert strong influences on visual attention when we search through real-world scenes. However, there is debate surrounding how they interact when both are present; specifically, results conflict as to whether memory consistently improves visual search when semantic knowledge is available to guide search. These conflicting results could be driven by distinct effects of different types of episodic memory, but this possibility has not been examined. To test this, we tracked participants' eyes while they searched for objects in semantically congruent and incongruent locations within scenes during a study and test phase. In the test phase containing studied and new scenes, participants gave confidence-based recognition memory judgments that indexed different types of episodic memory (i.e., recollection, familiarity, unconscious memory) for the background scenes, then they searched for the target. We found that semantic knowledge consistently influenced both early and late eye movements, but the influence of memory depended on the type of memory involved. Recollection improved first saccade accuracy in terms of heading towards the target in both congruent and incongruent scenes. In contrast, unconscious memory gradually improved scanpath efficiency over the course of search, but only when semantic knowledge was relatively ineffective (i.e., incongruent scenes). Together, these findings indicate that episodic memory and semantic knowledge are rationally integrated to optimize attentional guidance, such that the most precise or effective forms of information available - which depends on the type of episodic memory available - are prioritized.

Indexed as

AttentionConsciousnessEye MovementsMemory, EpisodicMental RecallPattern Recognition, VisualSemanticsUnconscious, PsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMaleRecognition, PsychologyYoung AdultEye trackingMemorySemantic knowledgeVisual attentionVisual search

Identifiers

PMID40399748
PMCPMC12273590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.